"Theories"

We need answers. There are still too many questions. Will we ever get them to our satisfaction? Likely not, but if we are going to, it must be within these next few years. The further away we get from 9/11/01, the easier it is for people to forget about it. Look at what happened after the JFK assassination.



See, people did question whether a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon DIRECTLY AFTER it happened. I've heard good arguments from both sides about what hit or did not hit the Pentagon that day, and I'm really not sure what to believe myself, but I was certainly surprised to see this footage. And it gets better (or worse?):



So what really happened? I'll write out exactly what I think here at a later date, but in the meantime, I'll say that there certainly seems to be a lot of merit in the theory of Globalhawks being used. However, if this was indeed a conspiracy I think a more likely scenario springs from the theory that the planes that had supposedly been hijacked by 19 arabs were in fact hijacked by Global Hawk technology. Don't get confused, a Globalhawk is a Northrop-Grumman unmanned missile drone, while "Global Hawk" is the name given to technology used by a pilot on the ground to take over control of a plane that is already in the air. There is nearly indisputable evidence that an Air Force E4B (described in the video below as "a state of the art flying command post") was in the air above the White House on the morning of 9/11, though the military/FAA/etc. of course will not confirm or deny what it was:



Equipped with Global Hawk technology, this "state of the art flying command post" would certainly be capable of taking over and controlling the planes that were "hijacked" and crashing them in to the WTC that day. If a plane did hit the Pentagon, I believe this also lends credence to the Global Hawk technology theory, because a plane being controlled remotely is much more capable of the flight pattern taken directly before the impact at the Pentagon than supposed pilot Hani Hanjour. In the end, I imagine it is likely a combination of the two theories but like I said, I'll write more on that later.

Robert M. Bowman was Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, and is a former United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology. He believes 9/11 was an "inside job" and that Dick Cheney is the main suspect, but why should we listen to someone with credentials like that?

Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist for the United States Department of Labor during 2001--2002, George W. Bush's first term. In 2005, he gained public attention as the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an "inside job" (link to that article is dead but here is another one by Reynolds discussing False Flag terrorism, etc), but again, why would we listen to such a crazy kook?

See, no prominent figures or former/current military/government agents are questioning the official story. Oh, wait...(plenty more where that came from, actually).

Wake up and let's save the country, k?

How Giuliani Treats His Constituents

What a jerk.



"You accuse me of corruption and committing a crime and I do not talk to you! (Especially when you have proof)."

This was before 9/11, so he couldn't lean on that. Nice to see he has such tact though.

News of the Day

Rolling Stone interview with Ron Paul. Ignore the potshots in the intro stating that Paul has "a goofy nostalgia for the gold standard," (wanting our paper money to be backed by something real is goofy?) and "a medieval view on abortion," (he is pro-life, but he would not use federal power to repeal Roe v. Wade, favoring leaving the decision up to the individual states as per the....Constitution of the United States of America). I'm a little surprised a publication like Rolling Stone, who still has a shred of credibility would throw crap like that in, but I think all major publications are required to take shots at him before publishing what he has to say, which is, of course, 100% correct.

George W. Bush still hasn't made a mistake as President. Or at least, he can't think of one. Funny, with all the bafflingly stupid decisions made by the White House since Bush took over, it's still impossible for anyone within the administration to name one. I'm surprised he didn't just go with the standard "I can't comment on that due to national security," or "I don't fully understand the question, so I can't answer it," like we've heard over and over lately from Alberto Gonzales, Condoleeza Rice, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove et al.

The Airline Terrorist Hoax. Makes sense, don't it? Think about this next time you're singled out for an "extra security check" by TSA.

Huge bailout coming for Citigroup. Yep, another billion dollar bailout is on it's way, courtesy of good ol' you and me! Though the writer makes a good point about the fact that the shareholders should have to pay for this, you KNOW that is not about to happen. The taxpayers are going to be stuck with this, just like we were after the Savings and Loan scandal. Citigroup made some bad decisions by buying up Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) at the same time that Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM's) were being promoted hard to the poor and middle class by the Government, the Federal Reserve (not actually a Federal institution, remember) and tons of mortgage/investment firms. Citigroup bought up a ton of the debt that had been taken on via ARM's by the poor and middle class, and now that it turns out a large percentage of those debts can't be paid back (surprise, surprise), Citigroup stands to lose billions of dollars. Instead of letting this happen, the Government will bail them out (a friend of my who works at the Fed called it a "Too big to fail scenario,") and there is a 99.9% chance they'll do it with our tax dollars. So, here's the breakdown: Citigroup makes a bad decision by buying up assets that end up failing and instead of making money on what they bought, they stand to lose billions. But, instead of having to pay the debilitating circumstances since they are one of the world's biggest banks, those costs are going to be foisted on the taxpayers, the same people that Citigroup was trying to make money off of when they bought up RMBS in the first place. Sounds fair, huh?

What We Choose To Ignore: A rundown of Executive Orders that effectively strip American Citizens of all their rights if the President declares and undefined "State of Emergency." This is pretty chilling stuff, and if you're somebody whose been paying attention to the viral rumors regarding the possibility of an American Police State, here's confirmation that it's possible. If you haven't been paying attention to stuff like this, well, now is the time.



"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier." Yes, that is a quote from George W. Bush in December of 2000. Another video highlighting our loss of freedom and our spiral towards authoritarian rule.



And, finally, something to brighten your day. A skydiving pug!



I wonder, when we're living under the iron fist of dictatorship, will pugs still be allowed to sky dive?