And so it's confirmed, she was shot before the bombing. This is not the normal MO of a suicide bombing. Another shocking surprise!
Monday, December 31, 2007
Saturday, December 29, 2007
What is Happening?
A major competitor for the first democratic elections since a military coup in the country of a prominent American "ally" was assassinated on Thursday night.
On Friday, it as announced that a major player (as far as fund raising and support of growth go) among the Repulican candidates for President will be excluded from the next round table discussion involving his parties candidates.
A prominent Democratic leader vying for the Presidency has stopped answering questions from the audience after speaking.
A guy wrote an article using the phrase "What's the Ding-Dang-Deelio?" and it made a lot of sense.
In what is being sold to us as a time of extreme danger to "the homeland," prominent police departments run sting operations to entrap innocent civillians for petty crimes.
And all this begs the questions. Just what the hell is going on around here these days? Bhutto's assassination presents questions that we know will likely never be fully answered, because all that ever happens in cases like this is that al-Qaeda is blamed initially and then everybody just forgets about it. Who knows what will happen there now? The general election will likely be canceled ("postponed") and Musharraf will continue to hold power. What a volatile country Pakistan is right now. Remember, Musharraf took over in a coup. The general public there is not exactly enamored with him. Now, someone who had a great chance to unseat him has just been killed a week before the election and it will likely go unsolved. Not only that, but the fact that it didn't go down like a "normal" suicide bombing (Bhutto was shot twice before the bomb exploded) just raises more questions. I have read about many, many suicide bombings but I don't remember ever reading one in which the attacker shot a specific victim and then detonated a bomb. I'm not saying it means anything specific or that it is completely unprecedented, just that it's weird and will raise questions. And what about theories that Bhutto was assassinated partly because of her chance of becoming a prominent world leader who holds the view that Osama bin Laden is dead? Read more about theories regarding the death of bin Laden here. I mean, it makes sense, doesn't it? It seems mighty unlikely that he's hauling that dialysis machine back and forth around caves in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and has been for 5 years. And you know, many world powers can hold the specter of bin Laden over their people to exert further control over them, giving those countries a lot to gain by perpetuating his legend. You know, what gets the media and the threat levels more riled up than a "new" bin Laden tape?
The major media has tried extra hard to ignore Ron Paul lately, but with his unprecedented fundraising success for a candidate of his stature (far behind the elite mass-media "frontrunners"), his one-day record for online contributions, (though notice they throw in a Howard Dean "Yeeeeeaawwww!" just so Paul doesn't get too full of himself) and the fact that his message reaches across the political spectrum, it is getting harder and harder to sweep him under the rug. Compounding what Paul is doing right, the Republicans are stuck with a bevy of lackluster candidates this year, none who have proven to be particularly strong at anything. They bicker, spew one-liners and talk about how great they did during 9/11 but none of them can handle a direct question, and come on...Look at Romney, Giuliani and Huckabee (the "frontrunners"). Those are 3 terrible options and I think Republicans are starting to recognize that. Not only that, but could either of those 3 beat Hilary Clinton in a general election? Take that in to account, Republicans out there. Romney....No (he's a mormon and he flip-flops more than Kerry was accused of doing in '04). Huckabee...No (religious conservatives won't out-vote women). Giuliani...No (he's gay and abortion friendly, plus all Democrats absolutely despise him). Hell,if Hilary were the Democratic nominee and one of those 3 were on the other side, even I would have to vote for Hilary. However, even as a democrat, I would vote for Paul over Hilary in an instant. Oh, and for you "Support our troops!"ers out there, Paul has gotten more contributions from military members than any other Republican candidate.
We have been taught that there are only 2 ways of thinking and we have to pick 1 of them. That is not true! There are infinite ways of thinking, and if we want to see change in our society we need to accept that and commit to it.
On Friday, it as announced that a major player (as far as fund raising and support of growth go) among the Repulican candidates for President will be excluded from the next round table discussion involving his parties candidates.
A prominent Democratic leader vying for the Presidency has stopped answering questions from the audience after speaking.
A guy wrote an article using the phrase "What's the Ding-Dang-Deelio?" and it made a lot of sense.
In what is being sold to us as a time of extreme danger to "the homeland," prominent police departments run sting operations to entrap innocent civillians for petty crimes.
And all this begs the questions. Just what the hell is going on around here these days? Bhutto's assassination presents questions that we know will likely never be fully answered, because all that ever happens in cases like this is that al-Qaeda is blamed initially and then everybody just forgets about it. Who knows what will happen there now? The general election will likely be canceled ("postponed") and Musharraf will continue to hold power. What a volatile country Pakistan is right now. Remember, Musharraf took over in a coup. The general public there is not exactly enamored with him. Now, someone who had a great chance to unseat him has just been killed a week before the election and it will likely go unsolved. Not only that, but the fact that it didn't go down like a "normal" suicide bombing (Bhutto was shot twice before the bomb exploded) just raises more questions. I have read about many, many suicide bombings but I don't remember ever reading one in which the attacker shot a specific victim and then detonated a bomb. I'm not saying it means anything specific or that it is completely unprecedented, just that it's weird and will raise questions. And what about theories that Bhutto was assassinated partly because of her chance of becoming a prominent world leader who holds the view that Osama bin Laden is dead? Read more about theories regarding the death of bin Laden here. I mean, it makes sense, doesn't it? It seems mighty unlikely that he's hauling that dialysis machine back and forth around caves in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and has been for 5 years. And you know, many world powers can hold the specter of bin Laden over their people to exert further control over them, giving those countries a lot to gain by perpetuating his legend. You know, what gets the media and the threat levels more riled up than a "new" bin Laden tape?
The major media has tried extra hard to ignore Ron Paul lately, but with his unprecedented fundraising success for a candidate of his stature (far behind the elite mass-media "frontrunners"), his one-day record for online contributions, (though notice they throw in a Howard Dean "Yeeeeeaawwww!" just so Paul doesn't get too full of himself) and the fact that his message reaches across the political spectrum, it is getting harder and harder to sweep him under the rug. Compounding what Paul is doing right, the Republicans are stuck with a bevy of lackluster candidates this year, none who have proven to be particularly strong at anything. They bicker, spew one-liners and talk about how great they did during 9/11 but none of them can handle a direct question, and come on...Look at Romney, Giuliani and Huckabee (the "frontrunners"). Those are 3 terrible options and I think Republicans are starting to recognize that. Not only that, but could either of those 3 beat Hilary Clinton in a general election? Take that in to account, Republicans out there. Romney....No (he's a mormon and he flip-flops more than Kerry was accused of doing in '04). Huckabee...No (religious conservatives won't out-vote women). Giuliani...No (he's gay and abortion friendly, plus all Democrats absolutely despise him). Hell,if Hilary were the Democratic nominee and one of those 3 were on the other side, even I would have to vote for Hilary. However, even as a democrat, I would vote for Paul over Hilary in an instant. Oh, and for you "Support our troops!"ers out there, Paul has gotten more contributions from military members than any other Republican candidate.
We have been taught that there are only 2 ways of thinking and we have to pick 1 of them. That is not true! There are infinite ways of thinking, and if we want to see change in our society we need to accept that and commit to it.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
The Fresh Prince and Hitler
First off, Ron Paul leads AOL Online Poll. No surprise since he wins most online polls but at 4am PST today he lead in every state except Utah (guess who?), New York and New Jersey (Giuliani of course). Not bad. You might want to consider looking in to it yourself, you know.
But mainly, Will Smith recently had to respond to a comment he made about Adolf Hitler that was interpreted completely incorrectly by some gossip magazines/shows/whatever. I think the funniest thing about this though was how hard he had to jump on the Holocaust angle. Laying it on a little thick there Will? I don't think you're in danger of being blacklisted or anything.
Nice Snopes reminder about the WWI Christmas Truce but the end is waaaaaaay sappy.
But mainly, Will Smith recently had to respond to a comment he made about Adolf Hitler that was interpreted completely incorrectly by some gossip magazines/shows/whatever. I think the funniest thing about this though was how hard he had to jump on the Holocaust angle. Laying it on a little thick there Will? I don't think you're in danger of being blacklisted or anything.
Nice Snopes reminder about the WWI Christmas Truce but the end is waaaaaaay sappy.
Sunday, December 2, 2007
The Martial Plan
From Rolling Stone, "How America Lost the War on Drugs." One of the most interesting articles I've read in some time. Quite a bit of research must've been done here. And just remember folks, $500 Billion down the drain already with $50 billion more being burned every year. At least drugs are pretty much non-existent now though. Money well spent!
US Claims Right to Kidnap Citizens of Other Nations. Extradition agreements are not enough, apparently. Have we really become so arrogant? I guess maybe it's stupid for me to ask that question. Can you imagine what the response would be from our government if this kind of thing started happening to American corporate executives and/or their families?
Surprisingly enough, it turns out that Iran wasn't as much of a threat as we were initially lead to believe. I am shocked. Shocked! Well, I'm sure an apology will be coming promptly from the Bush administration. The saddest thing is that one of the main points of the next Presidential election is still going to be candidates willingness to attack Iran.
The Thought Police are back! And you thought it was 2007...Nope, check again, it's 1984.
Tom Tomorrow: Mr. 9/11 Man .
Yet another case of a police officer using a taser with no justification has come to light, and yet again, it's been captured on video. The frequency of these incidents have been building and building of late and while the officer was given a three day suspension, it must scare the people of Austin to know that someone so volatile is still on the streets. I also can't say enough about the increase of incidents like this. It seems to me like a big first step towards the possibility of martial law. Officers are seemingly being instructed to taser people indiscriminately, and an extreme crackdown by police on the ordinary citizenry is the first step towards fascism.
According to a story from Editor and Publisher, a new Harvard University survey shows that 64% of those polled do not trust press coverage of the debates, 84% believe that media coverage has too much influence on peoples' voting choices and 88% believe that campaign coverage focuses on trivial issues. BUT, 79% believe that the next president is going to be "good for the country." Do you see how this makes no sense?
The dumbing down of society continues, as students in Arkansas are prevented from learning about evolution. Tons of jokes to be made here, but really, it's just sad. Huckabee for President!
US Claims Right to Kidnap Citizens of Other Nations. Extradition agreements are not enough, apparently. Have we really become so arrogant? I guess maybe it's stupid for me to ask that question. Can you imagine what the response would be from our government if this kind of thing started happening to American corporate executives and/or their families?
Surprisingly enough, it turns out that Iran wasn't as much of a threat as we were initially lead to believe. I am shocked. Shocked! Well, I'm sure an apology will be coming promptly from the Bush administration. The saddest thing is that one of the main points of the next Presidential election is still going to be candidates willingness to attack Iran.
The Thought Police are back! And you thought it was 2007...Nope, check again, it's 1984.
Tom Tomorrow: Mr. 9/11 Man .
Yet another case of a police officer using a taser with no justification has come to light, and yet again, it's been captured on video. The frequency of these incidents have been building and building of late and while the officer was given a three day suspension, it must scare the people of Austin to know that someone so volatile is still on the streets. I also can't say enough about the increase of incidents like this. It seems to me like a big first step towards the possibility of martial law. Officers are seemingly being instructed to taser people indiscriminately, and an extreme crackdown by police on the ordinary citizenry is the first step towards fascism.
According to a story from Editor and Publisher, a new Harvard University survey shows that 64% of those polled do not trust press coverage of the debates, 84% believe that media coverage has too much influence on peoples' voting choices and 88% believe that campaign coverage focuses on trivial issues. BUT, 79% believe that the next president is going to be "good for the country." Do you see how this makes no sense?
The dumbing down of society continues, as students in Arkansas are prevented from learning about evolution. Tons of jokes to be made here, but really, it's just sad. Huckabee for President!
Friday, November 30, 2007
"Theories"
We need answers. There are still too many questions. Will we ever get them to our satisfaction? Likely not, but if we are going to, it must be within these next few years. The further away we get from 9/11/01, the easier it is for people to forget about it. Look at what happened after the JFK assassination.
See, people did question whether a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon DIRECTLY AFTER it happened. I've heard good arguments from both sides about what hit or did not hit the Pentagon that day, and I'm really not sure what to believe myself, but I was certainly surprised to see this footage. And it gets better (or worse?):
So what really happened? I'll write out exactly what I think here at a later date, but in the meantime, I'll say that there certainly seems to be a lot of merit in the theory of Globalhawks being used. However, if this was indeed a conspiracy I think a more likely scenario springs from the theory that the planes that had supposedly been hijacked by 19 arabs were in fact hijacked by Global Hawk technology. Don't get confused, a Globalhawk is a Northrop-Grumman unmanned missile drone, while "Global Hawk" is the name given to technology used by a pilot on the ground to take over control of a plane that is already in the air. There is nearly indisputable evidence that an Air Force E4B (described in the video below as "a state of the art flying command post") was in the air above the White House on the morning of 9/11, though the military/FAA/etc. of course will not confirm or deny what it was:
Equipped with Global Hawk technology, this "state of the art flying command post" would certainly be capable of taking over and controlling the planes that were "hijacked" and crashing them in to the WTC that day. If a plane did hit the Pentagon, I believe this also lends credence to the Global Hawk technology theory, because a plane being controlled remotely is much more capable of the flight pattern taken directly before the impact at the Pentagon than supposed pilot Hani Hanjour. In the end, I imagine it is likely a combination of the two theories but like I said, I'll write more on that later.
Robert M. Bowman was Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, and is a former United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology. He believes 9/11 was an "inside job" and that Dick Cheney is the main suspect, but why should we listen to someone with credentials like that?
Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist for the United States Department of Labor during 2001--2002, George W. Bush's first term. In 2005, he gained public attention as the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an "inside job" (link to that article is dead but here is another one by Reynolds discussing False Flag terrorism, etc), but again, why would we listen to such a crazy kook?
See, no prominent figures or former/current military/government agents are questioning the official story. Oh, wait...(plenty more where that came from, actually).
Wake up and let's save the country, k?
See, people did question whether a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon DIRECTLY AFTER it happened. I've heard good arguments from both sides about what hit or did not hit the Pentagon that day, and I'm really not sure what to believe myself, but I was certainly surprised to see this footage. And it gets better (or worse?):
So what really happened? I'll write out exactly what I think here at a later date, but in the meantime, I'll say that there certainly seems to be a lot of merit in the theory of Globalhawks being used. However, if this was indeed a conspiracy I think a more likely scenario springs from the theory that the planes that had supposedly been hijacked by 19 arabs were in fact hijacked by Global Hawk technology. Don't get confused, a Globalhawk is a Northrop-Grumman unmanned missile drone, while "Global Hawk" is the name given to technology used by a pilot on the ground to take over control of a plane that is already in the air. There is nearly indisputable evidence that an Air Force E4B (described in the video below as "a state of the art flying command post") was in the air above the White House on the morning of 9/11, though the military/FAA/etc. of course will not confirm or deny what it was:
Equipped with Global Hawk technology, this "state of the art flying command post" would certainly be capable of taking over and controlling the planes that were "hijacked" and crashing them in to the WTC that day. If a plane did hit the Pentagon, I believe this also lends credence to the Global Hawk technology theory, because a plane being controlled remotely is much more capable of the flight pattern taken directly before the impact at the Pentagon than supposed pilot Hani Hanjour. In the end, I imagine it is likely a combination of the two theories but like I said, I'll write more on that later.
Robert M. Bowman was Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, and is a former United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology. He believes 9/11 was an "inside job" and that Dick Cheney is the main suspect, but why should we listen to someone with credentials like that?
Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist for the United States Department of Labor during 2001--2002, George W. Bush's first term. In 2005, he gained public attention as the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an "inside job" (link to that article is dead but here is another one by Reynolds discussing False Flag terrorism, etc), but again, why would we listen to such a crazy kook?
See, no prominent figures or former/current military/government agents are questioning the official story. Oh, wait...(plenty more where that came from, actually).
Wake up and let's save the country, k?
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
How Giuliani Treats His Constituents
What a jerk.
"You accuse me of corruption and committing a crime and I do not talk to you! (Especially when you have proof)."
This was before 9/11, so he couldn't lean on that. Nice to see he has such tact though.
"You accuse me of corruption and committing a crime and I do not talk to you! (Especially when you have proof)."
This was before 9/11, so he couldn't lean on that. Nice to see he has such tact though.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
News of the Day
Rolling Stone interview with Ron Paul. Ignore the potshots in the intro stating that Paul has "a goofy nostalgia for the gold standard," (wanting our paper money to be backed by something real is goofy?) and "a medieval view on abortion," (he is pro-life, but he would not use federal power to repeal Roe v. Wade, favoring leaving the decision up to the individual states as per the....Constitution of the United States of America). I'm a little surprised a publication like Rolling Stone, who still has a shred of credibility would throw crap like that in, but I think all major publications are required to take shots at him before publishing what he has to say, which is, of course, 100% correct.
George W. Bush still hasn't made a mistake as President. Or at least, he can't think of one. Funny, with all the bafflingly stupid decisions made by the White House since Bush took over, it's still impossible for anyone within the administration to name one. I'm surprised he didn't just go with the standard "I can't comment on that due to national security," or "I don't fully understand the question, so I can't answer it," like we've heard over and over lately from Alberto Gonzales, Condoleeza Rice, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove et al.
The Airline Terrorist Hoax. Makes sense, don't it? Think about this next time you're singled out for an "extra security check" by TSA.
Huge bailout coming for Citigroup. Yep, another billion dollar bailout is on it's way, courtesy of good ol' you and me! Though the writer makes a good point about the fact that the shareholders should have to pay for this, you KNOW that is not about to happen. The taxpayers are going to be stuck with this, just like we were after the Savings and Loan scandal. Citigroup made some bad decisions by buying up Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) at the same time that Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM's) were being promoted hard to the poor and middle class by the Government, the Federal Reserve (not actually a Federal institution, remember) and tons of mortgage/investment firms. Citigroup bought up a ton of the debt that had been taken on via ARM's by the poor and middle class, and now that it turns out a large percentage of those debts can't be paid back (surprise, surprise), Citigroup stands to lose billions of dollars. Instead of letting this happen, the Government will bail them out (a friend of my who works at the Fed called it a "Too big to fail scenario,") and there is a 99.9% chance they'll do it with our tax dollars. So, here's the breakdown: Citigroup makes a bad decision by buying up assets that end up failing and instead of making money on what they bought, they stand to lose billions. But, instead of having to pay the debilitating circumstances since they are one of the world's biggest banks, those costs are going to be foisted on the taxpayers, the same people that Citigroup was trying to make money off of when they bought up RMBS in the first place. Sounds fair, huh?
What We Choose To Ignore: A rundown of Executive Orders that effectively strip American Citizens of all their rights if the President declares and undefined "State of Emergency." This is pretty chilling stuff, and if you're somebody whose been paying attention to the viral rumors regarding the possibility of an American Police State, here's confirmation that it's possible. If you haven't been paying attention to stuff like this, well, now is the time.
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier." Yes, that is a quote from George W. Bush in December of 2000. Another video highlighting our loss of freedom and our spiral towards authoritarian rule.
And, finally, something to brighten your day. A skydiving pug!
I wonder, when we're living under the iron fist of dictatorship, will pugs still be allowed to sky dive?
George W. Bush still hasn't made a mistake as President. Or at least, he can't think of one. Funny, with all the bafflingly stupid decisions made by the White House since Bush took over, it's still impossible for anyone within the administration to name one. I'm surprised he didn't just go with the standard "I can't comment on that due to national security," or "I don't fully understand the question, so I can't answer it," like we've heard over and over lately from Alberto Gonzales, Condoleeza Rice, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove et al.
The Airline Terrorist Hoax. Makes sense, don't it? Think about this next time you're singled out for an "extra security check" by TSA.
Huge bailout coming for Citigroup. Yep, another billion dollar bailout is on it's way, courtesy of good ol' you and me! Though the writer makes a good point about the fact that the shareholders should have to pay for this, you KNOW that is not about to happen. The taxpayers are going to be stuck with this, just like we were after the Savings and Loan scandal. Citigroup made some bad decisions by buying up Residential Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS) at the same time that Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM's) were being promoted hard to the poor and middle class by the Government, the Federal Reserve (not actually a Federal institution, remember) and tons of mortgage/investment firms. Citigroup bought up a ton of the debt that had been taken on via ARM's by the poor and middle class, and now that it turns out a large percentage of those debts can't be paid back (surprise, surprise), Citigroup stands to lose billions of dollars. Instead of letting this happen, the Government will bail them out (a friend of my who works at the Fed called it a "Too big to fail scenario,") and there is a 99.9% chance they'll do it with our tax dollars. So, here's the breakdown: Citigroup makes a bad decision by buying up assets that end up failing and instead of making money on what they bought, they stand to lose billions. But, instead of having to pay the debilitating circumstances since they are one of the world's biggest banks, those costs are going to be foisted on the taxpayers, the same people that Citigroup was trying to make money off of when they bought up RMBS in the first place. Sounds fair, huh?
What We Choose To Ignore: A rundown of Executive Orders that effectively strip American Citizens of all their rights if the President declares and undefined "State of Emergency." This is pretty chilling stuff, and if you're somebody whose been paying attention to the viral rumors regarding the possibility of an American Police State, here's confirmation that it's possible. If you haven't been paying attention to stuff like this, well, now is the time.
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier." Yes, that is a quote from George W. Bush in December of 2000. Another video highlighting our loss of freedom and our spiral towards authoritarian rule.
And, finally, something to brighten your day. A skydiving pug!
I wonder, when we're living under the iron fist of dictatorship, will pugs still be allowed to sky dive?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
